<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multiple online brands &#8211; Merge or not to merge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.talash.net/blog/multiple-online-brands-merge-or-not-to-merge/119/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.talash.net/blog/multiple-online-brands-merge-or-not-to-merge/119/</link>
	<description>Indus Net Technologies’ weblog about news, business, design, coding, offshore outsourcing, products, process, and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:01:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mallikarjun</title>
		<link>http://www.talash.net/blog/multiple-online-brands-merge-or-not-to-merge/119/comment-page-1/#comment-484502</link>
		<dc:creator>Mallikarjun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talash.net/blog/multiple-online-brands-merge-or-not-to-merge/119/#comment-484502</guid>
		<description>Any new on working out a Web 2.0 solution is fraught a double edged sword.

One aspect which need intense work while overall brand building it reworking the site SEO tools what i mean is the keywords.

Today millions of pages get added to the web. That is the dynamics. Creating a composite site is inhouse job. But working on the web 2.0 of the site is a herculean task with very few language experts at disposal.

On one hand creating new content is going to be a interesting business proposition, as I myself am a content writer, but the matrix of working with the features of the product mapping with seo words is something needs to be looked into.

Otherwise, a one-stop-shop is often welcome if all the products are performing in tandem in the market. What I mean is as bringing optimum traffic without much deviation(statistical sense).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any new on working out a Web 2.0 solution is fraught a double edged sword.</p>
<p>One aspect which need intense work while overall brand building it reworking the site SEO tools what i mean is the keywords.</p>
<p>Today millions of pages get added to the web. That is the dynamics. Creating a composite site is inhouse job. But working on the web 2.0 of the site is a herculean task with very few language experts at disposal.</p>
<p>On one hand creating new content is going to be a interesting business proposition, as I myself am a content writer, but the matrix of working with the features of the product mapping with seo words is something needs to be looked into.</p>
<p>Otherwise, a one-stop-shop is often welcome if all the products are performing in tandem in the market. What I mean is as bringing optimum traffic without much deviation(statistical sense).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
